Neurobiology of Aging
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 200.e1-200.e10 , January 2012

Normal aging reduces motor synergies in manual pointing

  • Julius Verrel

      Affiliations

    • Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 82406 410; fax: +49 30 8249939
  • ,
  • Martin Lövdén

      Affiliations

    • Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Berlin, Germany
    • Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Ulman Lindenberger

      Affiliations

    • Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Berlin, Germany

Received 4 March 2010 ,Revised 14 June 2010 ,Accepted 5 July 2010.

  • Image Result

    Left: Setup and marker placement in start position. Note that the targets were placed in front of the left shoulder, thus the required movement trajectory was diagonally left and upward. Right: Illust

    Left: Setup and marker placement in start position. Note that the targets were placed in front of the left shoulder, thus the required movement trajectory was diagonally left and upward. Right: Illustration of the segmentation procedure. Cartesian 3-dimensional position data (top) and tangential velocity (bottom) of the finger tip. First, the main section of the pointing movement was determined as the interval during which the tangential velocity was above 10% of the peak velocity. Based on this, 5 time points of the movement (start, early, middle, late, and end) were determined. See text for more details.

  • Image Result
    Joint angle excursions (maximum minus minimum) during the pointing movement, for each joint angle and the 2 age groups. Significant differences between the age groups are indicated by stars (Welch's 2

    Joint angle excursions (maximum minus minimum) during the pointing movement, for each joint angle and the 2 age groups. Significant differences between the age groups are indicated by stars (Welch's 2-sample t test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM).

  • Image Result
    Results of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis as a function of movement phase and age group. (A) Goal-equivalent and nongoal-equivalent variability (GEV, NGEV). (B) UCM index (log10[GEV/NGEV]; s

    Results of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis as a function of movement phase and age group. (A) Goal-equivalent and nongoal-equivalent variability (GEV, NGEV). (B) UCM index (log10[GEV/NGEV]; see text). In (B) significant differences between the age groups are indicated by stars (Welch's 2-sample t test; *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM).

PII: S0197-4580(10)00313-1

doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.006

Neurobiology of Aging
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 200.e1-200.e10 , January 2012