“When does age-related cognitive decline begin?” Salthouse again reifies the “cross-sectional fallacy”

References 

1. Hofer SM, Sliwinski MJ, Flaherty BP. Understanding ageing: further comments on the limitations of cross-sectional ageing research. Gerontology. 2002;48:22–29
   • CrossRef
2. Riley MW. Aging and cohort succession: interpretations and misinterpretations. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1973;37:35–49
3. Ryder NB. The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review. 1965;30:843–861
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Schaie KW. A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin. 1965;64:92–107
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Schaie KW. Quasi-experimental designs in the psychology of aging. In:  Birren JE,  Schaie KW editor. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1977;p. 39–58
6. Schaie KW. Internal validity threats in studies of adult cognitive development. In:  Howe ML,  Brainerd CJ editor. Cognitive Development in Adulthood: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988;p. 241–272
7. Schaie KW, Hofer SM. Longityuindal studies in research on agng. In:  Birren JE,  Schaie KW editor. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. fifth ed.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2001;pp. 53–77
8. Schaie KW. Developmental Influences on Adult Intellectual Development: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005;
9. Schaie KW. Historical processes and patterns of cognitive aging. In:  Hofer SM,  Alwin DF editor. Handbook on Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008;p. 368–383
10. Schaie KW, Willis SL, Pennak S. A historical framework for cohort differences in intelligence. Research in Human Development. 2005;2:43–67
11. Willis SL. Cohort differences in cognitive aging: a sample case. In:  Schaie KW,  Schooler C editor. Social Structure and Aging: The Psychological Processes. New York: Erlbaum; 1989;p. 95–112