Neurobiology of Aging
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 525-527, April 2009

Exploring the generality of retest effects: Commentary on “When does age-related cognitive decline begin?”

  • Lise Abrams

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 352 392 2191; fax: +1 352 392 7985.

Department of Psychology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112250, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, United States

Received 11 November 2008; accepted 13 November 2008. published online 24 February 2009.

Abstract 

With respect to age differences in cognitive functioning, longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses have typically revealed differential patterns of results. Longitudinal comparisons show little or no age-related declines, whereas cross-sectional comparisons typically demonstrate poorer performance with increasing age. Salthouse presents evidence suggesting that longitudinal comparisons fail to detect age declines because the effects of prior test experience are not taken into account and that age-related declines in cognition begin in early adulthood. The present paper discusses some implications of these findings, such as their generalizability to other cognitive tasks, and highlights some additional findings in his paper that are worthy of discussion.

Keywords: Cognitive aging, Retest effects, Old–old adults, Longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0197-4580(09)00025-6

doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.11.012

Neurobiology of Aging
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 525-527, April 2009